Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer

169 So. 915, 125 Fla. 224
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 23, 1936·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

-The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus.

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Treat, et al., v. State, ex rel., 118 Fla. 899, 160 Sou. 498; State, ex rel., v. Sholtz, et al., 119 Fla. 704, 160 Sou. 872, and City of Bradenton v. State, 117 Fla. 579, 158 Sou. 165.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer, 169 So. 915, 125 Fla. 224 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 915 (Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. West Flagler Amusement Co. v. Rose
165 So. 60 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Treat v. State Ex Rel. Dann
160 So. 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
City of Bradenton v. State Ex Rel. Oliver
158 So. 165 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
State Ex Rel. Suwannee River Bridge Co. v. Sholtz
160 So. 872 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)