Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer

Supreme Court of Florida

Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer

169 So. 915, 125 Fla. 224

DecidedJuly 23, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 915 (Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State Ex Rel. Boozer, 169 So. 915, 125 Fla. 224 (Fla. 1936).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

-The writ of error brings for review judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus.

The judgment should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Treat, et al., v. State, ex rel., 118 Fla. 899, 160 Sou. 498; State, ex rel., v. Sholtz, et al., 119 Fla. 704, 160 Sou. 872, and City of Bradenton v. State, 117 Fla. 579, 158 Sou. 165.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI