Adams v. State

92 S.W. 1123, 78 Ark. 16, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 203
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 17, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 92 S.W. 1123 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. State, 92 S.W. 1123, 78 Ark. 16, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 203 (Ark. 1906).

Opinion

BatteE, J.

At the October, 1904, term of the Ouachita Circuit Court the grand jury returned into court an indictment against F. P. Adams, charging him with incest committed by having illicit intercourse with his niece, she being an unmarried woman and he a married man; and at the October, 1905, term of that court he was tried upon a plea of not guilty, found guilty as charged in the indictment, and his punishment was assessed at three years imprisonment in the penitentiary. He appealed to. this court.

In the trial of appellant for the offense charged against him, evidence was adduced by the State, over the objections of the appellant, to prove illicit relations between him and the niece mentioned in the indictment, which occurred more than three years before the finding of the indictment. The evidence tended to prove that these illicit relations, constituting incest, commenced six or seven years before the finding of the indictment, and continued to the time when the act for which he was indicted was committed. This evidence, although it discloses other acts of incest with the same niece, the indictment for which is barred by the statute of limitations, is admissible for the purpose of showing the probability of the commission of the offense charged, and sustains the evidence of such offense. Commonwealth v. Bell, 166 Pa. St. 405.

The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
702 S.W.2d 2 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
Collins v. State
669 S.W.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1984)
Hendrickson v. State
212 N.W.2d 481 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
Williford v. State
479 S.W.2d 244 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)
Wood v. State
450 S.W.2d 537 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)
Alford v. State
266 S.W.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1954)
Haller v. State
232 S.W.2d 829 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1950)
Abbott v. People
299 P. 1053 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1931)
Hettle v. State
222 S.W. 1066 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1920)
Carmen v. State
179 S.W. 183 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Cannon v. State
169 S.W. 812 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.W. 1123, 78 Ark. 16, 1906 Ark. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-ark-1906.