Adams v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Adams v. State

177 So. 2d 922, 42 Ala. App. 664

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 1964

Docket6 Div. 35

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 177 So. 2d 922 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. State, 177 So. 2d 922, 42 Ala. App. 664 (Ala. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal by an indigent inmate of Kilby Prison. It is taken from a judgment denying coram nobis.

Adams was indicted for larceny and receiving : he changed his plea to guilty after the State rested. A detective had related Adam’s confession. He was put on probation. On being again indicted,, revocation led him to prison.

He now complains that Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, is the key to his cell. This conclusion he comes to through a claim of an illegal search turning his pockets (filled with rare coins) inside out on his being picked up. Adams was in a cab going from pharmacy to pharmacy in Birmingham asking for paregoric.

Hard cases make bad law and case hardened petitioners sometimes make good pleas. Vide Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799.

However, a plea of guilty in open court obviates any consideration of whether or not Mapp is Janus-like.

The judgment below is due to be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI