Adams v. State

116 So. 413, 22 Ala. App. 424, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 106
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ala. App. 477
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1928·No. 4 Div. 379.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

The court has read the entire evidence in this case, sitting en banc, and we fail to find anything in same tending to connect this appellant with the possession of the still which was found. We likewise fail to find any evidence that the still was used, or suitable to be used, for the manufacture of prohibited liquors. The duly requested general affirmative charge in defendant’s favor should have been given. For the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. State, 116 So. 413, 22 Ala. App. 424, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 106 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

116 So. 413 (Adams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.