Adams v. State
90 So. 42, 18 Ala. App. 143, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 117
This text of 90 So. 42 (Adams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adams v. State, 90 So. 42, 18 Ala. App. 143, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 117 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921).
Opinion
We have carefully examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that the evidence for the state is not sufficient upon which to base a conviction, and that the affirmative charge as requested by the defendant should have been given. Mitchell v. State, ante, p. 119, 89 South. 98.
For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Leith v. State
101 So. 336 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Watts v. State
98 So. 914 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Wheat v. State
98 So. 698 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Dawkins v. State
98 So. 492 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Knight v. State
97 So. 163 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Koonce v. State
93 So. 214 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 So. 42, 18 Ala. App. 143, 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-state-alactapp-1921.