Adams v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Adams v. Spaulding

10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1887

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A. 688 (Adams v. Spaulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Spaulding, 10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384 (N.H. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Allen, J.

The only point raised by the defendant’s exception was decided in favor of the plaintiffs in Stevens v Chase, 61 N. H. 340, and no sufficient reason appears for overruling that decision. The supreme court has original jurisdiction of actions of replevin when the value of the property is alleged in the writ to be greater *385 than $13.33, although it may upon trial be proved to be less than that sum.

Exceptions overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen, J.

The only point raised by the defendant’s exception was decided in favor of the plaintiffs in Stevens v Chase, 61 N. H. 340, and no sufficient reason appears for overruling that decision. The supreme court has original jurisdiction of actions of replevin when the value of the property is alleged in the writ to be greater *385 than $13.33, although it may upon trial be proved to be less than that sum.

Exceptions overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-spaulding-nh-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack