Adams v. Spaulding

10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

The only point raised by the defendant’s exception was decided in favor of the plaintiffs in Stevens v Chase, 61 N. H. 340, and no sufficient reason appears for overruling that decision. The supreme court has original jurisdiction of actions of replevin when the value of the property is alleged in the writ to be greater *385 than $13.33, although it may upon trial be proved to be less than that sum.

Exceptions overruled.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Spaulding, 10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384 (N.H. 1887).

10 A. 688 (Adams v. Spaulding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chaffe v. Scheen
34 La. 684 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)