Adams v. Spaulding
10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384
Opinion
The only point raised by the defendant’s exception was decided in favor of the plaintiffs in Stevens v Chase, 61 N. H. 340, and no sufficient reason appears for overruling that decision. The supreme court has original jurisdiction of actions of replevin when the value of the property is alleged in the writ to be greater *385 than $13.33, although it may upon trial be proved to be less than that sum.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Spaulding, 10 A. 688, 64 N.H. 384 (N.H. 1887).
10 A. 688 (Adams v. Spaulding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chaffe v. Scheen
34 La. 684 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)