Adams v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adams v. Smith

124 So. 3d 366, 2012 WL 9337426

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 18, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-3077

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 3d 366 (Adams v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Smith, 124 So. 3d 366, 2012 WL 9337426 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Adams appeals a final judgment awarding Sherry and James Smith $47,634.00 on their counterclaim, plus $11,237.50 in attorney’s fees and costs. As the final judgment is valid on its face and Appellant does not allege any error on the merits, we affirm without further elaboration. The issues Appellant seeks to raise can only be addressed by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. We do not have jurisdiction to consider Appellant’s rule 1.540 arguments in this appeal from the final judgment.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Adams appeals a final judgment awarding Sherry and James Smith $47,634.00 on their counterclaim, plus $11,237.50 in attorney’s fees and costs. As the final judgment is valid on its face and Appellant does not allege any error on the merits, we affirm without further elaboration. The issues Appellant seeks to raise can only be addressed by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. We do not have jurisdiction to consider Appellant’s rule 1.540 arguments in this appeal from the final judgment.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 3d 366, 2012 WL 9337426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-smith-fladistctapp-2013.