Adams v. Shoopman

316 S.W.2d 840
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided October 10, 1958·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Casey Circuit Court, Honorable James C. Carter, Jr., Judge, dismissing appellants’ complaint seeking possession of a certain building occupied by appellee under a written lease. Appellants base their right of re-entry on the allegation of nonpayment of rent.

Inasmuch as the lease does not contain a forfeiture clause, the appellee’s failure to pay rent when due does not constitute a ground upon which appellant may be granted relief in this action. 32 Am.Jur., Landlord and Tenant, Section 852, p. 723; 51 C.J.S. Landlord and Tenant § 104(b), p. 683.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.

MONTGOMERY, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Shoopman, 316 S.W.2d 840 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).

316 S.W.2d 840 (Adams v. Shoopman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.