Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 23, 2021·No. 18-1767·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Auited States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1767V UNPUBLISHED REGINALD L. ADAMS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: January 4, 2021 V. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; HUMAN SERVICES, Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Respondent. Administration (SIRVA)

Phyllis Lile-King, The Lile-King Firm, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION’

On November 16, 2018, Reginald L. Adams filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seg.” (the “Vaccine Act’). Petitioner alleges that he suffered shoulder injuries related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA’) as a result of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine received on November 9, 2017. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed December 29, 2020, at 4§ 1-4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, he experienced the residual effects of his alleged injuries for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition. Petition at 1, 5-6; Stipulation at 9 3-6. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injuries, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury. ” Stipulation at J 6.

' Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, | am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, | agree that the identified material fits within this definition, | will redact such material from public access.

? National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on December 29, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. | find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, | award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $68,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at § 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). /d.

| approve the requested amount for Petitioner's compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.°

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

° Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

-) REGINALD L. ADAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 18-1767V Vv. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) KECK SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) a ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Reginald L. Adams, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. $$ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the Pneumococcal !3-valent Conjugate (“Prevnar-13”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the Prevnar-13 vaccine on or about November 9, 2017.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he sustained a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (““SIRVA”) following his Prevnar-13 vaccine. within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, that his alleged shoulder injuries were caused by the vaccine. He further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of his alleged injuries for more than six

months after vaccine administration. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injuries, or any other injury; and denies that his current condition is a sequelae of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

: eos i!

a Les > : | 1, . 1. issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should bee athe

abesseceed esaseereedt QC awarding

C2.

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $68,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount

represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§300aa-1 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable atiorneys” fees aud costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a