Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided January 4, 2017·No. 14-231·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

*********************** JANICE D. ADAMS, * No. 14-231V * Special Master Christian J. Moran Petitioner, * * Filed: December 9, 2016 v. * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages; Tetanus-Diphtheria- AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) * Shoulder injury related to vaccine Respondent. * administration. (“SIRVA”). *********************** Elizabeth M. Muldowney, Rawls, McNelis and Mitchell, P.C., Richmond, VA, for Petitioner; Ann D. Martin, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On March 26, 2014, Janice D. Adams (previously, Whitfield) filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq., alleging that the Tetanus-Dephtheria- Acellular Pertussis vaccination caused her to suffer a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). On February 23, 2015, the undersigned ruled, based upon respondent’s concession, see Respondent’s Report, filed February 19, 2015, that petitioners are entitled to compensation under the Vaccine Act.

On December 9, 2016, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, to which petitioner agrees. Based upon the record as a whole, the special master finds the proffer reasonable and that petitioner is entitled to an

1 The E-Government Act, 44 § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website. award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the attached Proffer the court awards petitioner:

1. A lump sum payment of $1,469,457.34, representing compensation for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($21,139.48), lost earnings ($1,221,078.00), pain and suffering ($221,591.39), and past unreimbursable expenses ($5,648.47), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Janice Adams. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a), except as set forth below in paragraph 2; and

2. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph II.B of the proffer attached hereto as “Appendix A,” paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).2

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 14-231V according to this decision and the attached proffer.3

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357- 6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000 capital and surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations: a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s; b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, or Aaa; c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA; d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, e. AA, AA+, or AAA. 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ ) JANICE D. ADAMS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 14-231V v. ) Special Master Moran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Laura Fox, MSN, BSN, RN, CNLCP, and

petitioner engaged Susan Riddick Graham, RN, BA, CCM, to provide an estimation of Janice

Adams’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine

related” is as described in the Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement, filed February 23, 2015.

All items of compensation identified in the joint life care plan are supported by the evidence, and

are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Janice Adams,

attached hereto as Tab A. 1 Respondent proffers that Janice Adams should be awarded all items

of compensation set forth in the joint life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A.

Petitioner agrees.

1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the joint life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.

-1- B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner has suffered a past

loss of earnings and will suffer a loss of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers

that Janice Adams should be awarded lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award for Janice Adams’s lost

earnings is $1,221,078.00. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $221,591.39 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents her expenditure of past unreimbursable

expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be

awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $5,648.47. Petitioner agrees.

E. Medicaid Lien

Petitioner represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against her.

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made

through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,

and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2

2 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

-2- A. A lump sum payment of $1,469,457.34, representing compensation for life care

expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($21,139.48), lost earnings

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Adams v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a