Adams v. Riker Operating Company, Inc.

68 N.E.2d 601, 296 N.Y. 521, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1138
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 1946·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in the negative. Second question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

• Concur: Lohghran, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ. Conway and Fuld, JJ., dissent upon the ground that the lease, both in its original form and as modified, provided for a rental in a graduated scale ” within the meaning Of Laws of 1945, chapter 314, section 13, as amended by Laws of 1946, chapter 273, and accordingly the lease provisions with regard to rent should control. Taking no part: Dye, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Riker Operating Company, Inc., 68 N.E.2d 601, 296 N.Y. 521, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1138 (N.Y. 1946).

68 N.E.2d 601 (Adams v. Riker Operating Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Seconset Corp.
274 A.D. 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Seconset Corp.
193 Misc. 111 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
King Arthur Restaurant, Inc. v. London Terrace, Inc.
273 A.D. 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Seven Eleven Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. Dave Herstein Co.
188 Misc. 713 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)