Adams v. Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adams v. Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.

246 A.D.2d 594, 667 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 594 (Adams v. Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 594, 667 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review three determinations of the respondent Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., all dated October 9, 1995, which, after a hearing, inter alia, expelled the petitioners from the Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

We reject the petitioners’ contentions and confirm the findings made by the respondent Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. The record reflects that the determinations were supported by substantial evidence (see, e.g., Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review three determinations of the respondent Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc., all dated October 9, 1995, which, after a hearing, inter alia, expelled the petitioners from the Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

We reject the petitioners’ contentions and confirm the findings made by the respondent Putnam Lake Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. The record reflects that the determinations were supported by substantial evidence (see, e.g., Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 594, 667 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-putnam-lake-volunteer-fire-department-inc-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack