Adams v. Powers

278 So. 2d 598, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5252
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 30, 1973·No. No. 43787·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ADKINS, Justice.

The motion of movant, Robert L. Adams, III, to proceed in forma pauperis upon a petition for writ of replevin, must be denied for failure to comply with the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 57.081, F.S.A.

Said motion to proceed being denied, this Court is without authority to consider said petition for writ of replevin.

This order is issued without prejudice against movant to proceed in the Court of appropriate jurisdiction for certification of insolvency in the manner required by Fla. Stat. § 57.081, F.S.A., for proceedings in forma pauperis. Such certification can be obtained from the clerk in each action only upon affidavit of insolvency which is supported by a written certificate signed by a a member of The Florida Bar of the county thát he has investigated the applicant’s affidavit and found it to be true, and has investigated the applicant’s claim and believes it to be meritorious as a matter of law.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Powers, 278 So. 2d 598, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 5252 (Fla. 1973).

278 So. 2d 598 (Adams v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fields v. Zinman
394 So. 2d 1133 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Lee v. City of Winter Haven
386 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1976
LaViolette v. Sapp
278 So. 2d 598 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)