Adams v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adams v. Power

30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 683 (Adams v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Power, 30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In this proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent Seymour Halpern as a candidate for the Liberal party’s nomination for the public office of Representative in Congress from the Sixth Congressional District of New York in the Primary Election to be held on June 18, 1968, (1) petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 1968, as dismissed the proceeding on the merits and (2) said designee cross-appeals from so much of said judgment as denied his motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground the court does not have jurisdiction of his person (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 8). Judgment affirmed, without costs. We do not reach the question of service of the papers herein because we have determined the appeal in favor of respondent-appellant (Halpern) on the merits. Leave is granted to appellants to appeal further to the Court of Appeals. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent Seymour Halpern as a candidate for the Liberal party’s nomination for the public office of Representative in Congress from the Sixth Congressional District of New York in the Primary Election to be held on June 18, 1968, (1) petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of the judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 4, 1968, as dismissed the proceeding on the merits and (2) said designee cross-appeals from so much of said judgment as denied his motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground the court does not have jurisdiction of his person (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 8). Judgment affirmed, without costs. We do not reach the question of service of the papers herein because we have determined the appeal in favor of respondent-appellant (Halpern) on the merits. Leave is granted to appellants to appeal further to the Court of Appeals. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-power-nyappdiv-1968.