Adams v. Power
239 N.E.2d 560, 22 N.Y.2d 783, 292 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1293
Opinion
[785] Order affirmed, without costs. On the cross appeal we find it unnecessary to reach the question of timeliness of service. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel, Jasen and Foreman
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Power, 239 N.E.2d 560, 22 N.Y.2d 783, 292 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1293 (N.Y. 1968).
239 N.E.2d 560 (Adams v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maloney v. Ulster County Board of Elections
21 A.D.3d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Ferris v. Sadowski
381 N.E.2d 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Ferris v. Sadowski
65 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)