Adams v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

D.C. Circuit

Adams v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

170 F. App'x 142

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2006

DocketNos. 04-5333, 04-5334

StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. App'x 142 (Adams v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 170 F. App'x 142 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, see Adams v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 332 F.Supp.2d 231 (D.D.C. 2004), except insofar as the district court based Part IV.C of its decision upon the alternative ground of res judicata.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI