Adams v. Park

156 S.E. 235, 171 Ga. 494, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 487
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 29, 1930
DocketNo. 8083
StatusPublished

This text of 156 S.E. 235 (Adams v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Park, 156 S.E. 235, 171 Ga. 494, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 487 (Ga. 1930).

Opinion

Hines, J.

The majority of this court are of the opinion that there is no merit in the assignments of error in the bill of exceptions. This being true, the petition for mandamus absolute should not be granted.

Mandamus absolute denied.

Russell, O. J., and Atlcinson, J., dissent. J. B. & T. B. Burnside and Pierce Brothers, for the applicant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 235, 171 Ga. 494, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-park-ga-1930.