Adams v. Olson

Washington Supreme Court

Adams v. Olson

232 P. 361, 132 Wash. 129, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 949

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 26, 1924

DocketNo. 18888. Department Two.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 232 P. 361 (Adams v. Olson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Olson, 232 P. 361, 132 Wash. 129, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 949 (Wash. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Mitchell, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action at law. The record shows there was a positive conflict in the evidence at the trial upon the material issues presented by the pleadings. That we will not disturb such an order has often been announced as the established rule of practice governing appeals in such cases. Alberts v. Rasher, Kingman, Herrin, 128 Wash. 32, 221 Pac. 975, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Main, G. J., Mackintosh, Holcomb, and Fullerton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action at law. The record shows there was a positive conflict in the evidence at the trial upon the material issues presented by the pleadings. That we will not disturb such an order has often been announced as the established rule of practice governing appeals in such cases. Alberts v. Rasher, Kingman, Herrin, 128 Wash. 32, 221 Pac. 975, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Main, G. J., Mackintosh, Holcomb, and Fullerton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 P. 361, 132 Wash. 129, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-olson-wash-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack