Adams v. Olson
232 P. 361, 132 Wash. 129, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 949
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 1924·No. No. 18888. Department Two.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action at law. The record shows there was a positive conflict in the evidence at the trial upon the material issues presented by the pleadings. That we will not disturb such an order has often been announced as the established rule of practice governing appeals in such cases. Alberts v. Rasher, Kingman, Herrin, 128 Wash. 32, 221 Pac. 975, and cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
Main, G. J., Mackintosh, Holcomb, and Fullerton, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Olson, 232 P. 361, 132 Wash. 129, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 949 (Wash. 1924).
232 P. 361 (Adams v. Olson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Winter v. Neuman
259 P. 1083 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)