Adams v. Ofought

Fourth Circuit

Adams v. Ofought

592 F. App'x 225

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2015·No. No. 14-7234·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Dwayne Adams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, finding that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adams v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, No. 7:12-cv-00462-NKM-RSB (W.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2014). We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Dwayne Adams appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, finding that Adams failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adams v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, No. 7:12-cv-00462-NKM-RSB (W.D.Va. Aug. 4, 2014). We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Adams v. Ofought, 592 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

592 F. App'x 225 (Adams v. Ofought) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related