Adams v. Munson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Adams v. Munson

4 Miss. 77

DecidedDecember 15, 1838

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Miss. 77 (Adams v. Munson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Munson, 4 Miss. 77 (Mich. 1838).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Trotter

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause, and the eighteen others which precede it in the above enumeration, were submitted to the court as delay cases on the suggestion in writing of the counsel for the defendants in error. We have carefully inspected the record in each of the several cases embraced in this list, and are of the opinion that in each of them the suggestion is true. In several of the cases there has been no assignment of errors, in some only a general assignment, not pointing out any cause of objection to the 'judgment below.

We do not esteem such an assignment to be a compliance with the rule of this court on that subject. But if the same had been regular, we are satisfied, upon a full examination of the proceedings in the court below, that there is no error in the judgment.

The judgment of the court below in each of the cases above set down, must, therefore, be affirmed with costs and damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Trotter

delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause, and the eighteen others which precede it in the above enumeration, were submitted to the court as delay cases on the suggestion in writing of the counsel for the defendants in error. We have carefully inspected the record in each of the several cases embraced in this list, and are of the opinion that in each of them the suggestion is true. In several of the cases there has been no assignment of errors, in some only a general assignment, not pointing out any cause of objection to the 'judgment below.

We do not esteem such an assignment to be a compliance with the rule of this court on that subject. But if the same had been regular, we are satisfied, upon a full examination of the proceedings in the court below, that there is no error in the judgment.

The judgment of the court below in each of the cases above set down, must, therefore, be affirmed with costs and damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Miss. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-munson-miss-1838.