Adams v. McCann

The Superior Court of New York City

Adams v. McCann

36 N.Y. St. Rep. 421

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedJanuary 5, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 421 (Adams v. McCann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. McCann, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 421 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the trial judge at special term. As to the claim made upon this appeal that the plaintiffs should have had at least a personal judgment against Patrick McCann for the reason that the latter waived a trial by jury, it should be said that the case contains no evidence of any such waiver.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J., concur. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of the trial judge at special term. As to the claim made upon this appeal that the plaintiffs should have had at least a personal judgment against Patrick McCann for the reason that the latter waived a trial by jury, it should be said that the case contains no evidence of any such waiver.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Sedgwick, Ch. J., and Freedman, J., concur. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.Y. St. Rep. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-mccann-nysuperctnyc-1891.