Adams v. Mayor & Common Council of Plainfield

166 A. 164, 110 N.J.L. 377, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 498
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 27, 1933·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court dismissing the writ of certiorari previously allowed to the prosecutor reviewing an ordinance of the city of Plainfield that reduced the salaries of the firemen of that city.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Lloyd, and reported in 109 N. J. L. 282. We observe that the opinion in two instances inadvertently mentions the “Walsh act” where the reference is clearly to the Home Rule act (Pamph. L. 1917, ch. 152), the first of the references being to article 13 of the last mentioned statute.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.

For reversal — JSTone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Mayor & Common Council of Plainfield, 166 A. 164, 110 N.J.L. 377, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 498 (N.J. 1933).

166 A. 164 (Adams v. Mayor & Common Council of Plainfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Isola v. Borough of Belmar
112 A.2d 738 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Sagarese v. Bd. of Health of Morristown
107 A.2d 351 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Flynn v. Union City
105 A.2d 34 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Beyer v. Tp. Committee of the Tp. of Mt. Holly
69 A.2d 42 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)