Adams v. Mayor & Common Council of Plainfield
This text of 166 A. 164 (Adams v. Mayor & Common Council of Plainfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court dismissing the writ of certiorari previously allowed to the prosecutor reviewing an ordinance of the city of Plainfield that reduced the salaries of the firemen of that city.
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Lloyd, and reported in 109 N. J. L. 282. We observe that the opinion in two instances inadvertently mentions the “Walsh act” where the reference is clearly to the Home Rule act (Pamph. L. 1917, ch. 152), the first of the references being to article 13 of the last mentioned statute.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 10.
For reversal — JSTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A. 164, 110 N.J.L. 377, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-mayor-common-council-of-plainfield-nj-1933.