Adams v. Leon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adams v. Leon

18 A.D.2d 998, 238 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4250

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 998 (Adams v. Leon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Leon, 18 A.D.2d 998, 238 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4250 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property sustained as a result of an automobile ¡accident, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 25, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113.) Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by defendant, was injured when defendant, in making a “ U-turn,” allegedly skidded on sand and gravel, lost control of the automobile, and came in contact with a pole. In our opinion, the record presents a triable ¡ issue of fact as to defendant’s negligence in the operation of the automobile. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property sustained as a result of an automobile ¡accident, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 25, 1962, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and directed an assessment of damages. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113.) Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by defendant, was injured when defendant, in making a “ U-turn,” allegedly skidded on sand and gravel, lost control of the automobile, and came in contact with a pole. In our opinion, the record presents a triable ¡ issue of fact as to defendant’s negligence in the operation of the automobile. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 998, 238 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-leon-nyappdiv-1963.