Adams v. Lang

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adams v. Lang

250 A.D. 707, 294 N.Y.S. 494, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8506

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion, on the ground that the Statute of Limitations is a six-year statute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within twenty days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion, on the ground that the Statute of Limitations is a six-year statute.

Adams v. Lang, 250 A.D. 707, 294 N.Y.S. 494, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 707 (Adams v. Lang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.