Adams v. La Comb
1 Dall. 440
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided June 15, 1789·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
in the charge to the Jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the Court, that the right of pursuing and seizing goods after their removal, was confined to the goods of the Lessee, from whom the rent was really due; and that the goods of a stranger could only be distrained while they were on the premisses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. La Comb, 1 Dall. 440 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1789).
1 Dall. 440 (Adams v. La Comb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Derbyshire Bros. v. McManamy
101 Pa. Super. 514 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Walsh v. Philadelphia Bourse
32 Pa. Super. 348 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Dawson v. Watson
11 Del. 30 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1880)