Adams v. La Comb

1 Dall. 440
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedJune 15, 1789
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Dall. 440 (Adams v. La Comb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. La Comb, 1 Dall. 440 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1789).

Opinion

Shippen, President,

in the charge to the Jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the Court, that the right of pursuing and seizing goods after their removal, was confined to the goods of the Lessee, from whom the rent was really due; and that the goods of a stranger could only be distrained while they were on the premisses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Derbyshire Bros. v. McManamy
101 Pa. Super. 514 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Walsh v. Philadelphia Bourse
32 Pa. Super. 348 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Dawson v. Watson
11 Del. 30 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Dall. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-la-comb-pactcomplphilad-1789.