Adams v. La Comb

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Adams v. La Comb

1 U.S. 440

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 15, 1789

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 440 (Adams v. La Comb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. La Comb, 1 U.S. 440 (1789).

Pincite

Opinion

Shippen, President,

in the charge to the jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the court, that the right of pursuing and seizing goods, after their removal, was confined to the goods of the lessee, from whom the rent was really due ; and that the goods of a stranger could only be distrained, while they were on the premises,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shippen, President,

in the charge to the jury, delivered it as the clear opinion of the court, that the right of pursuing and seizing goods, after their removal, was confined to the goods of the lessee, from whom the rent was really due ; and that the goods of a stranger could only be distrained, while they were on the premises,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 U.S. 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-la-comb-pa-1789.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack