Adams v. Kyzer
61 Miss. 407
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
It was erroneous to hear the motion to dissolve the injunction and sustain it at a place out of the district in which the suit was pending. Chancellors are appointed for chancery districts, and [409]*409are confined to them in the performance of judicial acts, except as authorized by law, and we are not aware of any law providing for hearing a motion to dissolve an injunction outside of the district in which the cause is pending.
Decree revised and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Kyzer, 61 Miss. 407 (Mich. 1883).
61 Miss. 407 (Adams v. Kyzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Corporate Management, Inc. v. Greene Rural Health Center Board of Trustees
47 So. 3d 142 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2010)
Corporate Management, Inc. v. Greene Rural Health Center
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2009
Cashin v. Murphy
96 So. 747 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
Carpenter v. Carpenter
101 A. 628 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1917)
Simmons v. Hopson's Bayou Drainage District
72 So. 901 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)