Adams v. Kinzer & Jones Manuf'g Co.

Third Circuit

Adams v. Kinzer & Jones Manuf'g Co.

76 F. 800, 22 C.C.A. 581, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2181

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 76 F. 800 (Adams v. Kinzer & Jones Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Kinzer & Jones Manuf'g Co., 76 F. 800, 22 C.C.A. 581, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2181 (3d Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The unusual delay which has occurred in the disposition of this case has not been occasioned by the existence of any doubt in the mind of either of us upon any question which it presents. The decision now to be announced was reached soon after the argument, and it has been supposed that it had been long since promulgated. Our attention is now called to the fact that this [804]*804Was not done, and we are unwilling that the omission should continue to await the preparation of any statement of the grounds of our conclusion. It is sufficient to say that the opinion filed in the circuit court is quite adequate, and is concurred in by all of us. Therefore, upon that opinion, the decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The unusual delay which has occurred in the disposition of this case has not been occasioned by the existence of any doubt in the mind of either of us upon any question which it presents. The decision now to be announced was reached soon after the argument, and it has been supposed that it had been long since promulgated. Our attention is now called to the fact that this [804]*804Was not done, and we are unwilling that the omission should continue to await the preparation of any statement of the grounds of our conclusion. It is sufficient to say that the opinion filed in the circuit court is quite adequate, and is concurred in by all of us. Therefore, upon that opinion, the decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 F. 800, 22 C.C.A. 581, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-kinzer-jones-manufg-co-ca3-1896.