Adams v. I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp.
452 So. 2d 1001, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1984
DocketNo. 84-456
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 452 So. 2d 1001 (Adams v. I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adams v. I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp., 452 So. 2d 1001, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Where a trial judge is presented with facts which make it appear inequitable to enforce a final default judgment against a garnishee, he may, in the exercise of discretion, set aside the judgment so as to permit a hearing. See United Presidential Life Insurance Co. v. King, 361 So.2d 710 (Fla.1978).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Foxbridge, Inc. v. Tartan-Laver Delray, Inc.
528 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
452 So. 2d 1001, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-icma-retirement-corp-fladistctapp-1984.