Adams v. I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp.

452 So. 2d 1001, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1984·No. No. 84-456·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where a trial judge is presented with facts which make it appear inequitable to enforce a final default judgment against a garnishee, he may, in the exercise of discretion, set aside the judgment so as to permit a hearing. See United Presidential Life Insurance Co. v. King, 361 So.2d 710 (Fla.1978).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp., 452 So. 2d 1001, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13895 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

452 So. 2d 1001 (Adams v. I.C.M.A. Retirement Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foxbridge, Inc. v. Tartan-Laver Delray, Inc.
528 So. 2d 1255 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)