Adams v. Humphreys

Ohio Supreme Court

Adams v. Humphreys

500 N.E.2d 1373, 27 Ohio St. 3d 43, 27 Ohio B. 456, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 782

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 26, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2008

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 500 N.E.2d 1373 (Adams v. Humphreys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Humphreys, 500 N.E.2d 1373, 27 Ohio St. 3d 43, 27 Ohio B. 456, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 782 (Ohio 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

While the facts here are sparse, leaving some doubt as to whether appellant’s conviction was the result of a trial or of a guilty plea, the dismissal of the habeas corpus action below was nonetheless proper because such action may not be used as a substitute for appeal. Stahl v. Shoemaker (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 351, 354 [4 O.O. 3d 485], and In re Piazza (1966), 7 Ohio St. 2d 102, 103 [36 O.O. 2d 84],

For reason of the foregoing, the judgment of the court of appeals is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI