Adams v. Hull
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308
Opinion
The Supreme Court held the parol evidence inadmissible, but -
The Court of Errors reversed the decision, holding it competent for the defendant to prove by parol the considera[309] tion of the second note, and thus lay a foundation for the set off pro tanto, against the plaintiff’s demand.
Reversed 11 to 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Hull, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308 (Adams v. Hull) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.