Adams v. Hull
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308
This text of 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308 (Adams v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adams v. Hull, 1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
The Supreme Court held the parol evidence inadmissible, but -
The Court of Errors reversed the decision, holding it competent for the defendant to prove by parol the considera[309]*309tion of the second note, and thus lay a foundation for the set off pro tanto, against the plaintiff’s demand.
Reversed 11 to 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Lock. Rev. Cas. 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-hull-nycterr-1799.