Adams v. Horton

116 A. 426, 97 N.J.L. 312, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 191

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, ICat-zenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Horton, 116 A. 426, 97 N.J.L. 312, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1922).

Pincite

116 A. 426 (Adams v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.