Adams v. Horton
116 A. 426, 97 N.J.L. 312, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 191
This text of 116 A. 426 (Adams v. Horton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adams v. Horton, 116 A. 426, 97 N.J.L. 312, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 191 (N.J. 1922).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Black, ICat-zenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Somers Construction Co. v. Board of Education
198 F. Supp. 732 (D. New Jersey, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 A. 426, 97 N.J.L. 312, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-horton-nj-1922.