Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp.

752 N.W.2d 518, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 356, 2008 WL 2852421

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 16, 2008

DocketA08-236

StatusPublished

This text of 752 N.W.2d 518 (Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp., 752 N.W.2d 518, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 356, 2008 WL 2852421 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 8, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI