Adams v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adams v. Hoffman

112 A.D.2d 335, 491 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56474

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 22, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 335 (Adams v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Hoffman, 112 A.D.2d 335, 491 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), entered January 17, 1984, which, inter alia, granted defendant CNA Insurance Company’s motion to vacate its default in answering, on condition that said defendant pay to plaintiffs’ counsel the sum of $250.

Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the sum to be paid by defendant CNA Insurance Company as a condition of vacating its default in answering from $250 to $750. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Said defendant’s time within which to pay the increased sum is extended until 10 days after the service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in vacating defendant CNA Insurance Company’s default in answering, but should have conditioned the grant upon said defendant’s payment to plaintiffs’ counsel of the sum of $750. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), entered January 17, 1984, which, inter alia, granted defendant CNA Insurance Company’s motion to vacate its default in answering, on condition that said defendant pay to plaintiffs’ counsel the sum of $250.

Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the sum to be paid by defendant CNA Insurance Company as a condition of vacating its default in answering from $250 to $750. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Said defendant’s time within which to pay the increased sum is extended until 10 days after the service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry.

Special Term did not abuse its discretion in vacating defendant CNA Insurance Company’s default in answering, but should have conditioned the grant upon said defendant’s payment to plaintiffs’ counsel of the sum of $750. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 335, 491 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-hoffman-nyappdiv-1985.