Adams v. Heath
This text of 26 A.D.3d 157 (Adams v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), entered January 12, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants-respondents-appellants’ post-trial motion to the extent of vacating the jury verdict insofar as it awarded the infant plaintiff $100,000 for past pain and suffering, directed a new trial on the issue of damages for past pain and suffering unless the infant plaintiff accepted a reduced award of $25,000, otherwise denied defendants-respondents-appellants’ motion, and denied the infant plaintiffs cross motion for a new trial on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in finding that the award of $100,000 for the infant plaintiffs essentially cosmetic injury materially deviated from what would be reasonable compensation, and therefore appropriately directed a new trial on the issue of damages unless the infant plaintiff stipulated to a reduced award of $25,000 (see CPLR 5501 [c]). We have considered the parties’ other requests for affirmative relief on the appeal and cross appeal, and find them unavailing. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Williams, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 157, 807 N.Y.S.2d 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-heath-nyappdiv-2006.