Adams v. Harvey

230 P. 436, 131 Wash. 701, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1044
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1924·No. No. 18374·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court adhere to the views expressed by the Departmental opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 129 Wash. 483, 225 Pac. 407. Therefore, as stated in that opinion, let $250 be deducted from the judgment, and as thus modified it is affirmed. Appellant will recover costs in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Harvey, 230 P. 436, 131 Wash. 701, 1924 Wash. LEXIS 1044 (Wash. 1924).

230 P. 436 (Adams v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacific Gamble Robinson Co. v. Chef-Reddy Foods Corp.
710 P.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1985)