Adams v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Adams v. Harris

107 S.E. 369, 26 Ga. App. 617, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 557

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 13, 1921

Docket12098, 12099

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.E. 369 (Adams v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Harris, 107 S.E. 369, 26 Ga. App. 617, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 557 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. It was not error to overrule the motion for a continuance.

2. Under the facts of the case it was not error to direct a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount of the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees sued for.

3. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the prayer of the defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed on main hill of exceptions; cross-Mil dismissed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI