Adams v. Hancock

29 S.E. 715, 103 Ga. 561, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 21, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 715 (Adams v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Hancock, 29 S.E. 715, 103 Ga. 561, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 426 (Ga. 1897).

Opinion

Little, J.

Even if the law of the present case be as contended by the plaintiff in error (but as to which no ruling is now made), it does not appear from the record that the facts required the verdict; for the evidence was directly conflicting upon a controlling issue. Therefore, in view of the provisions of section 5585 of the Civil Code, this court will not reverse a judgment granting a first new trial. •

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Equitable petition. Before Judge Smith. Montgomery superior court. April term, 1897. A. L. Lanier and J. H. Martin, for plaintiffs. W L. Clarke and E. D. Graham, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. Perry
81 S.E.2d 874 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Sims Estates Inc. v. Walker
74 S.E.2d 465 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Bluestein v. Amason
174 S.E. 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 715, 103 Ga. 561, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-hancock-ga-1897.