Adams v. Hancock
This text of 29 S.E. 715 (Adams v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even if the law of the present case be as contended by the plaintiff in error (but as to which no ruling is now made), it does not appear from the record that the facts required the verdict; for the evidence was directly conflicting upon a controlling issue. Therefore, in view of the provisions of section 5585 of the Civil Code, this court will not reverse a judgment granting a first new trial. •
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.E. 715, 103 Ga. 561, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-hancock-ga-1897.