Adams v. Guynes
This text of 42 So. 960 (Adams v. Guynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to the question of the interruption of prescription this case is on all fours with the case of W. R. King v. William P. Guynes et al., 42 South. 959, ante, p. 344, this day decided.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided, and reversed, and it is now ordered and decreed that the pleas of prescription filed by the defendants herein be overruled, and that this case be remanded to the district court for further proceedings according to law, defendants to pay costs of appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 So. 960, 118 La. 348, 1907 La. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-guynes-la-1907.