Adams v. Grey
11 Misc. 446, 32 N.Y.S. 223, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 421
This text of 11 Misc. 446 (Adams v. Grey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adams v. Grey, 11 Misc. 446, 32 N.Y.S. 223, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 421 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
Opinion
Without deciding whether the court had power-in the first instance to grant the injunction under the peculiar circumstances disclosed, it was certainly not a writ of right; and the Court- had power to vacate it, and the discretion was not abused in this instance.
The order must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Fitzsimons and Newburger, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 Misc. 446, 32 N.Y.S. 223, 65 N.Y. St. Rep. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-grey-nynyccityct-1895.