Adams v. Gonzales

236 F. App'x 977
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 25, 2007
Docket05-60874
StatusUnpublished

This text of 236 F. App'x 977 (Adams v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Gonzales, 236 F. App'x 977 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Moses Appoh Adams, a citizen of Ghana, challenges the Board of Immigration Ap *978 peals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen. The Government contends Adams’ petition for review is timely only as to the denial of his motion to reconsider, while his brief challenges only the denial of his motion to reopen. We agree.

Because Adams’ petition for review was not filed within 30 days of the denial of the motion to reopen, it is dismissed as to that denial. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS, 997 F.2d 108, 111 (5th Cir.1993). Adams’ petition is timely as to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider. Adams has waived review of that denial, however, by failing to challenge it in his brief. See Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 n. 15 (5th Cir.1993); Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS, 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir.1986). Therefore, his petition is denied as to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 F. App'x 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-gonzales-ca5-2007.