Adams v. Glatt
This text of 116 S.E. 555 (Adams v. Glatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A motion to set aside a verdict and judgment, based on matters not appearing on the face of the record, is in effect a motion for a new trial, and is subject to all the rules of law governing such motions, so as to require a brief of the evidence (James v. Douglasville Banking Co., 26 Ca. App. 509 (106 S. E. 595); Ca. Ry. & El. Co. v. Hamer, 1 Ga. App. 673 (58 S. E. 54); Adams v. Overland-Madison Co., 27 Ga. App. 531, 533 (3) (109 S. E. 413) ); and where, as in the instant case, the order of the trial judge overruling and denying the [54]*54motion to set aside the verdict and judgment previously entered in the case shows affirmatively that no brief of the evidence was filed, and that the court did not pass upon the merits of the motion, the judgment denying the motion cannot be reversed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 S.E. 555, 30 Ga. App. 53, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-glatt-gactapp-1923.