Adams v. Gilmore

161 N.E.2d 553, 82 Ohio Law. Abs. 425, 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 967
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 7, 1959
DocketNo. 24783
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 N.E.2d 553 (Adams v. Gilmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Gilmore, 161 N.E.2d 553, 82 Ohio Law. Abs. 425, 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 967 (Ohio Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

[426]*426OPINION

Per CURIAM:

The following errors are assigned in the instant appeal:

“1. The decision of the court was contrary to the weight of the evidence.

“2. The decision of the court was contrary to law.”

Upon our examination of the record, we find these claims of error without merit.

It was the right of the trial judge to determine the credibility of the witnesses as evidenced by their testimony, and to draw reasonable inferences therefrom. The burden of proof was, under the pleadings, upon the plaintiff to prove the defendant his debtor, and not upon the defendant to prove a gift of money.

The court’s conclusion that the defendant should prevail, we find to be within the evidence and the law; and, as a consequence, the judgment should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

DOYLE, PJ, HUNSICKER and GRIFFITH, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowman v. Blair
889 P.2d 1069 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 N.E.2d 553, 82 Ohio Law. Abs. 425, 1959 Ohio App. LEXIS 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-gilmore-ohioctapp-1959.