Adams v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission
This text of 288 So. 2d 263 (Adams v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that the conduct complained of by appellant was properly held to be a discretionary function by the trial court, the waiver of sovereign immunity provided [264]*264for by Section 768.15, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., does not obtain inasmuch as appellee was at the time of the conduct complained of performing a discretionary function which is made an exception to the said statutory waiver of immunity. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing the complaint for damages, which is the subject matter of review herein, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 So. 2d 263, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-game-fresh-water-fish-commission-fladistctapp-1974.