Adams v. Freeman

12 Johns. 408
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1815·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Fer Curiam.

To entera dwelling house without license, is,* in law, a trespass. Any person professing to keep an inn, thereby gives general license to all persons to- enter his house. But the house of the plaintiff does not appear to have been an inn, and, therefore, to render such ah entry lawful*, there must be a permission express or implied; and familiar’intimacy may be evidence of general license for such purpose. According to the evidence, here was no such permission ; and, there? fore, the act of entering the plaintiff’s house was a trespass* Besides, if the defendant had received permission to enter, as "by being asked to walk in, upon his knocking at the door, hi,s subsequent conduct was such an abuse of the license, as to render him a trespasser ab initia.

Judgment reversed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Freeman, 12 Johns. 408 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).

12 Johns. 408 (Adams v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foye v. Sewell
21 Abb. N. Cas. 15 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1888)
Divine v. McCormick
50 Barb. 116 (New York Supreme Court, 1867)
Martin v. Houghton
1 Abb. Pr. 339 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
Markham v. Brown
8 N.H. 523 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1837)