Adams v. Foley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Adams v. Foley

179 A. 297, 133 Me. 516, 1935 Me. LEXIS 51

DecidedJune 5, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 179 A. 297 (Adams v. Foley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. Foley, 179 A. 297, 133 Me. 516, 1935 Me. LEXIS 51 (Me. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The sole issue in this case was whether or not plaintiff’s intestate had, during her lifetime, made a gift to defendant of a certain bank book and the [517]*517account evidenced by it. Two witnesses testified to the fact of the gift. They were not contradicted. Their evidence was not inherently improbable. The jury believed them. We see no reason for disturbing the decision thus rendered. Motion overruled.

Charles F. Adams, pro se. Ralph W. Crockett, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The sole issue in this case was whether or not plaintiff’s intestate had, during her lifetime, made a gift to defendant of a certain bank book and the [517]*517account evidenced by it. Two witnesses testified to the fact of the gift. They were not contradicted. Their evidence was not inherently improbable. The jury believed them. We see no reason for disturbing the decision thus rendered. Motion overruled.

Charles F. Adams, pro se. Ralph W. Crockett, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A. 297, 133 Me. 516, 1935 Me. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-foley-me-1935.