Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Adams v. Florida Parole Commission

Adams v. Florida Parole Commission

734 So. 2d 603, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9110, 1999 WL 454505
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 1999
DocketNo. 99-0948
StatusPublished

This text of 734 So. 2d 603 (Adams v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Florida Parole Commission, 734 So. 2d 603, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9110, 1999 WL 454505 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus without affording petitioner the opportunity to reply to respondent’s response below. See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So.2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, the trial court’s order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is quashed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

JOANOS, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Singletary
709 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Bard v. Wolson
687 So. 2d 254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
734 So. 2d 603, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9110, 1999 WL 454505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-1999.