Adams v. Florida National Bank at Orlando

182 So. 2d 466, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5917
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1966·No. No. 323·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ellison v. Riddle, Fla. App.1964, 166 So.2d 840 and A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc. v. Romanach, Fla.App. 1964, 165 So.2d 817.

SMITH, C. J., WALDEN, J., and ALLEN, WILLIAM P., Associate Judge, concur.

Ordered that appellants’ petition for rehearing, motion to certify question as one of great public interest and motion for oral argument are hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams v. Florida National Bank at Orlando, 182 So. 2d 466, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5917 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

182 So. 2d 466 (Adams v. Florida National Bank at Orlando) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bergin v. Kickliter
538 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Adams v. Florida National Bank of Orlando
188 So. 2d 807 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)