Adams v. Fleming

136 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 181, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 845
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1926
Docket17529
StatusPublished

This text of 136 S.E. 336 (Adams v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adams v. Fleming, 136 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 181, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 845 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the petition as amended.

2. Under the facts of the case the failure to instruct the jury upon the law of the statute of limitations was not error.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of .the motion for a new trial require another hearing of the ease.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 181, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-fleming-gactapp-1926.