Adams v. Equifax
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA BRANDON ADAMS, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00506-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 14] EQUIFAX, 7 Defendant 8 On May 24, 2023, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Brandon Adams’ complaint with leave to file an amended complaint by June 26, 2023. ECF No. Adams did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 15}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)) 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 14) is accepted, and plaintiff Brandon Adams’ complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. 19 I FURTHER ORDER that plaintiff Brandon Adams must file an amended complaint by 20]| June 26, 2023. Failure to do so will result in this case being closed. 21 DATED this 12th day of June, 2023. 22 Z. 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Equifax (Adams v. Equifax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.